data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98ab5/98ab5bb6c920cd0221b9ed61f394ce1c57b6a265" alt=""
He begins by citing other overrated athletes that Brett's overratedness? exceeds (ie. Nolan Ryan, James Worthy, and Patrick Ewing). He even claims Shaq was overrated coming out of college and still is now. NONE OF THESE ATHLETES ARE OVERRATED MARK. Bradley continues by arguing that Kurt Warner has had a better career than Brett. Yes, that inconsistent, "I've had three legitimate full seasons, four good seasons" Warner. I give Kurt all the credit in the world and believe he deserves a legitimate shot at the Hall of Fame based on what he did in those seasons, but he has NOT had a first ballot career, not set record upon record, and not started EVERY SINGLE GAME since he was given a starting job.
Bradley says, "Pleas oh please let him stay gone this time," claiming that ESPN having a story about how the game will never be the same without him is a bunch of crock. This sounds to me like a... let's see... what will I call it... an "Upset The Falcons Front Office F'd Up and Made The Team I Cover Suck" writer guy. That's right. I said it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb15e/bb15e1a7bdf229fe244bc20a99c52101529d205d" alt=""
Bradley and his absurd ideas have even made me feel bad for a former Chicago Bear (yuck). Bradley, who shares names with Chicago's 2005 2nd round pick, has perpetually cursed the receiver from Oklahoma. In five NFL seasons, he has accumulated 963 yards on 68 receptions (7 TDs). A year later, in 2006, the Packers selected some guy named Greg Jennings 52nd overall who has panned out just a bit better (2,844 yards on 178 catches and 24 TDs.)
Yes I know that's a stretch, the whole curse thing. But I don't like this Mark Bradley dude whatsoever.